<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Another day in the life of a programmer gal.</title><description>Curiosity is an everlasting flame that burns in everyone's mind...
Curiosity is such a powerful force. Without it, we wouldn't be who we are today. Curiosity is the passion that drives us through our everyday lives. We have become explorers and scientists with our need to ask questions and to wonder.
--Clara Ma, Elementary school student.</description><link>http://theniceweb.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>155</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-3308962653237131601</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-03-13T10:06:39.410-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>hosting</category><title>Blogger to stop FTP publishing...</title><atom:summary type='text'>Whatever was free once, is no longer free, after all, Google has to get money out of something else, other than ads...I had used Blogger for a while, probably since their beginning when it was acquired by Google.I never liked to host my blog on their servers though, and I still won't. Hosting on my own account gives me the freedom of owning anything I post, whether it is a rant, an image or just </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2010/03/blogger-to-stop-ftp-publishing.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-6578868265411304489</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-03-13T09:52:57.351-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>localization</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>globalization</category><title>To nvarchar or to varchar in SQL Server to accept French text</title><atom:summary type='text'>I found one single character from the French language that its binary representation is not the same for Unicode and Windows-1252. The oe ligature. Let me rant about it...create table test_table(name1 varchar (1) ,name2 nvarchar (1) )insert test_tablevalues ('œ', 'œ')select * from test_tableselect ASCII(name1), ASCII(name2), Unicode(name1), unicode(name2) from test_tableselect COL_LENGTH('</atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2010/03/to-nvarchar-or-to-varchar-in-sql-server.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-1141125356070680508</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-03-04T18:43:17.793-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>fooling around</category><title>I couldn't stop laughing...</title><atom:summary type='text'></atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2010/03/i-couldnt-stop-laughing.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-5377003231778251583</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-02-02T22:26:34.621-07:00</atom:updated><title>Java Initialization blocks...why should we ever use them?</title><atom:summary type='text'>Coming from a C# world I'm trying to get a grasp on the Java language, mostly for comparison purposes and to see if really the grass is greener on the other side of the fence.What I like so far of the Java 1.6 that I see C# might benefit from:1. The main one is cross platform portability. I wish Mono would have more support.2. Enums are more complex, but I'm wondering if we ever really use that </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2010/02/java-initialization-blockswhy-should-we.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-5919097190382599884</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-04T18:52:07.173-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>vacation</category><title>Cuban flag with an HDR touch</title><atom:summary type='text'>We drove to St Agustin while visiting Florida these holidays and to my surprise they had a museum with Martí and the Cuban flag :)... mi bandera.</atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2010/01/cuban-flag-with-hdr-touch.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-1580640735782211659</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-05T08:44:26.714-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>caching</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>HTTP</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>IE6 and IE5</category><title>HTTP 1.1 caching directives for dummies and caching problems for old versions of Internet Explorer.</title><atom:summary type='text'>The reason why I published this link is because a coworker had a problem with viewing a PDF on IE6 when the cache was set to no-store over https.The problem does not happen with Internet Explorer 7  or above or with FireFox, but the old IEs fail to retrieve the files when the cache directive is no-store or no-cache.More of this on:Internet Explorer file downloads over SSL do not work with the </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/12/http-11-caching-directives-for-dummies.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-2097966353564760396</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-02T19:21:17.548-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>data exchange</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>schema files</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>xml</category><title>The importance of schemas, where's that XSD file?</title><atom:summary type='text'>I'm coming across more and more projects that make heavy use of xml for data integration or data exchange that lack of schema files.First case:My team was POC-ing the integration with a third party web service. I won't mention names but this company is one of the main sources of collected data for rating. After a purchased subscription for monthly text files with data dumps we are also able to </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/12/importance-of-schemas-wheres-that-xsd.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-2045777958265833798</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-04T21:47:12.825-07:00</atom:updated><title>Re Microsoft's Entity Framework: persistence ignorance is a bliss I won't give up on</title><atom:summary type='text'>I came across this articleWhy use the Entity Framework? Yeah, why exactly?refuting a marketing like article by one of the EF team members.After using NHibernate for a while and looking into JPA and old JDO on the Java world, I don't think I'll get my hands on the EF any time soon, if I can avoid it.Why? The main reasons are summarized on this site:ADO .NET Entity Framework Vote of No ConfidenceI </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/11/re-microsofts-entity-framework.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-7595032449361021527</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-26T20:36:42.142-06:00</atom:updated><title>RIP Geocities</title><atom:summary type='text'>http://geocities.yahoo.com/http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/10/26/geocities.closing/index.htmlI had my first free sites posted there back in the late 90s...This is how the web used to look like back then :-phttp://web.archive.org/web/19961022173245/http://www.geocities.com/</atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/10/rip-geocities.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-180992320117366431</guid><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-29T08:31:23.818-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>ramblings</category><title>Debunking the duct tape programmer</title><atom:summary type='text'>The nasty truth about misapplying duct tape solutions in serious software development is that the duct tape solution ends up creating unnecessary additional complexity because it doesn’t address the whole problem, just the symptoms. This isn’t unique to software development, but if duct tape solutions are used to achieve short term gains, then future solutions are built on a foundation of duct </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/09/debunking-duct-tape-programmer.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-6756299315394946437</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-25T20:31:57.164-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Agile</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>UI</category><title>UX advice I got from an expert...</title><atom:summary type='text'>1. Give users multiple ways to achieve their goals2. Give users all the functions they need to achieve the task at hand.3. Be consistent in navigation, screen layout, and interaction design.4. Use ‘widgets’ correctly. Incorrect use of widgets make people confused.5. Assume users have no memory. They shouldn’t need to remember things about function or navigation.6. Users are like Bears. Never </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/08/usability-advise-i-got-from-expert.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-3772154587206383945</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-11T12:37:58.731-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>web 2.0</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>web composition pluggable architecture</category><title>Composing web applications with the ASP.NET frameworks in the market... MVC 2 Areas vs MVC with MEF</title><atom:summary type='text'>On my previous post I ranted about the need my team has for a plug in implementation for a web portal. I'm sure this requirement is on almost every web team that develops a web portal.We were paying close attention to the ASP.NET MVC framework in conjunction with MEF:MEF and ASP.NET MVC sampleand see great potential here. the only drawback is that plug ins will run as part of the same application</atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/08/composing-web-applications-with-aspnet.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-4523066825445580633</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-05T08:22:35.021-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>web 2.0</category><title>Can cross browser communication solve my need for a true composite web application or SSO is the best way to go?</title><atom:summary type='text'>I must confess that the lack of posts on my blog are mainly due to a very silly reason, I started playing FarmVille on Facebook with my friends and it reminded me of my favorite game SimCity.What I like most about the game is how it runs on an iframe, is able to send requests to all the FB friends and keeps the FB session alive even though I haven't clicked outside of the FarmVille iframe in a </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/08/can-cross-browser-communication-solve.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-6278766260365886981</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-29T11:09:51.347-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>fooling around</category><title>Did you ever wonder how Bill Gates' FB profile page looks like?</title><atom:summary type='text'>I should be posting about serious technical concerns and I soon will, but this is hysterical...</atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/07/did-you-ever-wonder-how-does-bill-gates.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-4266997542264042267</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-15T09:20:47.283-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Mocks</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Architecture</category><title>The concept of test beds or velcros for software modules...</title><atom:summary type='text'>Last week I attended a conference by Mario Cardinal at MSN Canada. The conference was part of the Toronto Architecture User Group.The presentation had quite a few valid points along with the concept of "velcro" or test bed for modules. Test beds are a very familiar concept in electronics. In order to test hard drives or dvd drives, the manufacturer create test beds as opposed to test the parts in</atom:summary><enclosure type='video/mp4' url='http://www.blogger.com/video-play.mp4?contentId=dcdd3235a86c16a&amp;type=video%2Fmp4' length='0'/><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/06/concept-of-test-beds-or-velcros-for.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-2924751373267739722</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-05T09:29:27.246-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>fooling around</category><title>Being tech support for the fam...</title><atom:summary type='text'>I like helping my family whenever I can. Two weekends ago I set up the wireless network at my aunt's and last weekend my dad had a problem with a software he installed.He needed the Vademecum application to do some research on prescription drugs (dad is Endocrinologist and draws comics on his free time)The Vademecum application is a Java based desktop application and for some reason, after Dad </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/06/being-tech-support-for-fam.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-3745064219416741328</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-25T22:32:25.826-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Java</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>C#</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Back to Basics</category><title>Java vs. C# access modifiers looked at by a C# programmer</title><atom:summary type='text'>I'm looking into the SCJP 6 as I don't have hands on experience on Java projects (only academic apps).I had bookmarked long time ago a great C# vs. Java comparison Dave Obasanjo made:A COMPARISON OF MICROSOFT'S C# PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE TO SUN MICROSYSTEMS' JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGEI noticed tonight that the member's access modifiers could use some tuning and show:&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/05/java-vs-c-access-modifiers-looked-by-c.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-4640636238826601943</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-21T08:11:57.346-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>C#</category><title>Adding an empty item to an IList collection at runtime.</title><atom:summary type='text'>How can I add a new empty item to a datasource (BindingSource) if the collection that it contains has objects of unknown type at design time:                          if (dataSource.GetType() == typeof(BindingSource))            {                IEnumerator en = dataSource.GetEnumerator();                en.MoveNext();                Type t = en.Current.GetType();</atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/05/adding-empty-item-to-ilist-collection.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-5622612311239391124</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-18T17:07:05.576-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Out of Curiosity</category><title>The Aqua Tower in Chicago, my favorite piece of architecture</title><atom:summary type='text'>Visiting downtown Chicago I couldn't help but falling in love with this piece of art and  its eternal waves...AQUA from Spirit of Space on Vimeo.</atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/05/aqua-tower-in-chicago-my-favorite-piece.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-2747946524319136437</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-13T11:10:52.665-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Out of Curiosity</category><title>Silverlight development on Eclipse, with c# though :)</title><atom:summary type='text'>For all the Java junkies that can't get away from Eclipse, please see the release of  Eclipse4SL from Soyatec.I particurlarly prefer Visual Studio but can tell that the Express editions are not the best choice when debugging .NET code.</atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/05/silverlight-development-on-eclipse-with.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-812864147928225183</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-29T09:12:17.532-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>SQL Server stuff</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Merge Replication</category><title>Old SQL Server 2005 merge replication bug, how to determine version on the subscribers and details</title><atom:summary type='text'>I got the following email from devx.com, unfortunately when I replied to this colleague, the email bounced. I'm hoping he can Google this up.Hi Lizet,   I just read your article on www.devx.com about data loss in Merge Replication.  Unfortunately we are experiencing this exact same bug. I have already upgraded  the subscriber server to SP3. Do you know if the fix for this issue is included  in </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/04/old-sql-server-2005-merge-replication.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-7346167698936725107</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-26T08:20:36.947-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Out of Curiosity</category><title>Can't wait to touch it :)</title><atom:summary type='text'></atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/03/cant-wait-to-touch-it.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-6822948879644720894</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-25T10:12:55.660-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Reporting Services</category><title>A long awaited feature on Reporting Services 2008... rich text formatting</title><atom:summary type='text'>It's finally here, had I had this feature at the beginning of last year...Finally you can apply different styles to the text on your text boxes and even more, you can retrieve rich formatted text from the database and view the formatting on your report.It doesn't work well with background color attributes yet...List of new features Thread on MSDN about rich formatted text coming from the </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/03/long-awaited-feature-on-reporting.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-6388872269145598878</guid><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-20T15:23:36.005-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>composed applications</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>wcsf</category><title>WCSF falling short on composing web applications?</title><atom:summary type='text'>I'm right now looking for options on composing web applications. I recently took part of an interesting project with the composite application block framework (CAB) developed by the patterns and practices team and am certainly looking for the web equivalent. That been said I should add I have a great deal of frustration now.I had been subscribed to several discussion threads at Codeplex for the </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/03/wcsf-falling-short-on-composing-my-web.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14212809.post-3003713753097860745</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-17T08:42:14.143-06:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>TSQL</category><title>I hope they deprecate the money data type in SQL Server</title><atom:summary type='text'>In SQL Server 2000 and 2005 you have the money data type and the smallmoney data type. (Oracle doesn't have this data type)You wouldn't think there is anything smaller than a penny or a cent in money matters, so why did they designed these data types with 4 decimal places? To help hackers puts all the partial pennies in a separate bank account? :-p or to keep compatibility with Excel and allow </atom:summary><link>http://theniceweb.com/2009/03/i-hope-they-deprecate-money-data-type.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Lizet Pena de Sola)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item></channel></rss>